2017 Corporate Counsel Conference
22nd Annual Uvaldo Herrera National Moot Court Competition
The Annual Uvaldo Herrera National Moot Court Competition brings together over 30 teams of Latino law students from the nation’s top law schools to argue a case currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. This year the competition will take place at the Intercontinental Miami Hotel in Miami, FL during the Corporate Counsel Conference.
The HNBA has set aside a block of rooms for students at a reduced rate. Please contact Michelle C. Avelino, HNBA Program & Administrative Coordinator, at firstname.lastname@example.org for instructions on how to reserve a room at the student rate.
MOOT COURT REGISTRATION
Moot Court Registration Deadline: Monday, January 9, 2017
NOTE: All team members must be active members of the HNBA and Law Student Division in order to compete in the HNBA’s Moot Court Competition.
MOOT COURT SCHEDULE
Current Schedule as of 10/20/16. Subject to change.
Thursday, March 30
|8:00 am – 9:00 am||Moot Court Orientation|
|10:00 am – 11:15 am||1st Preliminary Round|
|11:35 am – 12:50 pm||1st Preliminary Round|
|2:00 pm – 3:15 pm||2nd Preliminary Round|
|3:35 pm – 4:50 pm||2nd Preliminary Round|
Friday, March 31
|9:00 am – 10:15 am||Quarter Final Round|
|11:00 am – 12:15 pm||Quarter Final Round|
Saturday, April 1
|9:00 am – 10:15 am||Semi Final Round|
|2:00 pm – 3:15 pm||Final Round|
MOOT COURT MATERIALS
Brief Filing Deadline: Friday, January 27, 2017 at 11:59p.m. EST
**The briefs are to be submitted electronically to email@example.com by 11:59 PM EST on January 27, 2017. Each team must submit the original version (with signatures and other identifying information on the cover) and one clean brief (with no identifying information). The briefs should be submitted as PDFs.
Please be sure to check periodically for updates.
- 2017 Rules and Procedures
- 2017 Moot Court Problem
- 2017 Moot Court Oral Argument Score Sheet
- 2017 Moot Court Brief Score Sheet
1/13/17 A clarification has been requested on the following questions:
- What is the difference between “using” and “relying on” documents of the actual parties and the amici?
- With respect to #8, are the teams allowed to “use” any briefs and/or pleadings filed with any trial or appellate court by the actual parties or amiciin the moot court problem so long as the teams do not “rely on” them? In other words, are we allowed to read, or otherwise use, the documents cited in #8?
I refer you “Section D, BRIEFS, No. 2” which provides in part that
By signing and submitting the original brief . . . team members [certify they] have not obtained, accessed, or viewed the briefs or pleadings of actual parties or amici on which the moot court problem may be based; and . . . have not obtained, accessed, or viewed any verbatim report or other document containing oral arguments cited in the moot court problem.”
Therefore, teams may not “use” (i.e. avail oneself of) or “rely” (i.e. depend on) the briefs, pleadings or oral arguments in preparing and submitting.
1/13/17 A clarification has been requested in regards to the release and posting of previous winning briefs.
The HNBA has never released nor posted winning briefs from past competitions and will continue not to do so.
1/13/17 A clarification has been requested on whether competitors will be provided a list of cases to use for briefs and whether this is an open or closed universe.
The only cases that students should use are those already cited in the material; i.e. this is a closed universe.
1/23/17 A clarification has been requested on whether in the brief competitors may use cases mentioned, referred, and cited to in the cases provided in the case material.
Cases mentioned, referred and cited in the cases provided may be used.